Models of Management of Physical Culture and Sports in the Country and in the Metropolis

The relevance of this study is due to the active development of physical culture and sports in Russia, which requires the search and consideration of the most effective management methods both at the national level and in regions and large cities. The purpose of this article is to consider management models in the field of physical culture in the country as a whole, as well as in megacities. The study shows that the key issues of management in this area is the role of the state, while special importance in the scientific literature is given to the problems of the relationship between the state and private business. As a result of the analysis, it was revealed that private capital is actively involved in the implementation of projects to create sports infrastructure in megacities in which projects have high profitability. The chosen model of management of the sphere of physical culture and sports in general is important to consider both at the national and urban levels, since in addition to a significant contribution to the health and quality of life of the population, the development of the sports industry makes a significant contribution to the economy, including by increasing the prestige of the country or metropolis.

1. Якубов Ю.Д. Модели государственной политики в области спорта // Вестник экономики, права и социологии. 2012. № 4. С. 211–213.

2. Hoye R., Smith A.C.T., Nicholson M., Stewart B. Sport Management: principles and applications // Sport management Series, fourth edition. 2015. URL: https://eclass.uoa.gr/modules/document/file.php/PHED398/SportManagementReadings/SportManagementPrincip lesandApplications04thEdition05BDr.Soc5D.pdf

3. Kopanska A., Osinski R., Korbus B. Private entities motivations to participate in public-private partnerships // Socia-Economic Planning Sciences 2024. Vol. 92. Р. 101841.

4. Цепелева А.Д. Совершенствование механизма государственно-частного партнерства в сфере услуг физической культуры и спорта: дисс. … кан. экон. наук. СПб., 2015. 167 с.

5. Chen Z., Zhao Y., Zhou X., Zhang L. Investigating critical factors that encourage private partners to participate in sports and leisure characteristic town public-private partnerships: evidence from China // Sustainability. 2020. № 12(8). Р. 3212.

6. Папоян Р.А., Воротников А.М. Проблема взаимодействия государства и бизнеса в развитии спортивной инфраструктуры // Журнал социологические исследования. 2021. Т. 6. № 3. С. 22–30.

7. Певная М.В., Кузьминчук А.А., Телепаева Д.Ф. Государственное регулирование спортивного волонтерства: Российский и зарубежный опыт // Вопросы управления. 2017. № 3(27). С. 35–49.

8. Yuen B. Public-private partnership in Singapore sports hub (Zur Ökonomik von Spitzenleistungen im internationalen Sport). Hamburg University Press, Hamburg, Р. 207–229. URL: https://doi.org/10.15460/hup.250.1899

9. McCloy C., Thibault L. Hosting policies of sport events // Sport Policy in Canada. 2013. Р. 243–265. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hjk9x.10

10. Maunteanu S.M. Project and sports events management // Review of International Comparative management. 2011. Special Number 1/2011. Р. 441–446.