The Social Competence of the Younger Generation as One of the Factors Shaping Political Behavior

The article analyzes the work of Russian and foreign researchers on the topic of youth social competence as one of the factors shaping political behavior. The conducted research required the solution of several tasks, including the disclosure of the concept of social competence of the younger generation in modern science, the definition of its importance in political socialization, the assimilation of a system of values, skills necessary to fulfill political roles. The purpose of the study is to study the social competence of the younger generation from the perspective of shaping political behavior. The novelty of this study lies in the presented conclusions that the social competence of the younger generation, including political competence, affects how young people comprehend and participate in political processes. The practical significance of the work is due to the possibility of using the findings in substantiating an adaptive model of political behavior formation.

The author comes to the conclusion that the social competence of the younger generation is one of the important factors in the formation of political activity. It is determined by the access and impact of opportunities, which vary significantly depending on the specific cultural environment. These gaps in opportunities lead to inequalities in political participation throughout life.

1. Jabar Kader Ahmed. Youth and their participation in the political process: a sociological analytical study // Journal of Raparin University. 2024. № 11 (2). Р. 763–788.

2. Нагаева А.Д., Ластовка К.А., Антипова Е.И. Участие молодежи в политической жизни страны // Вопросы науки и образования. 2018. № 7 (19). С. 285–287.

3. Северухина Д.Д. Политическое поведение и участие. Формы и факторы участия и неучастия в политике // Вестник Удмуртского университета. Серия «Философия. Психология. Педагогика». 2017. № 1. С. 96–104.

4. Дегтярев А.К., Щербакова Л.И. Политическое поведение: интерпретация в социологическом воззрении М. Вебера и П. Бурдье // Социально-гуманитарные знания. 2013. № 7. С. 1–10.

5. Ekman J., Amnå E. Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology // Human Affairs. 2012. № 22. Р. 283–300. DOI: 10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1

6. Wray-Lake L., Metzger A., Syvertsen A.K. Testing multidimensional models of youth civic engagement: Model comparisons, measurement invariance, and age differences // Applied Developmental Science. 2017. № 21. Р. 266–284. DOI: 10.1080/10888691.2016.1205495

7. Lutz C., Hoffmann C.P. The dark side of online participation: Exploring non-, passive and negative participation // Information, Communication & Society. 2017. № 20. Р. 876–897. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1293129

8. Eckstein K., Noack P., Gniewosz B. Attitudes toward political engagement and willingness to participate in politics: Trajectories throughout adolescence. Journal of Adolescence. 2012. № 35. Р. 485–495. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.07.002

9. Russo S., Stattin H. Stability and change in youths’ political interest. Social Indicators Research. 2017. № 132. Р. 643–658. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-016-1302-9

10. Flanagan C.A. Teenage citizens: The political theories of the young. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013. 320 р.

11. Campbell D.E. Voice in the classroom: How an open classroom climate fosters political engagement among adolescents // Political Behavior. 2008. № 30. Р. 437–454. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-008-9063-z

12. Putnam R.D. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, 2000. 592 р.

13. Абенова И.А. Характеристика понятия «социальная компетентность» // Вестник науки и образования. 2021. № 10-1 (113). С. 68–72.

14. Obradović J., Masten A.S. Developmental antecedents of young adult civic engagement // Applied Developmental Science. 2007. № 11. Р. 2–19. DOI: 10.1080/10888690709336720

15. Teney C., Hanquinet L. High political participation, high social capital? A relational analysis of youth social capital and political participation // Social Science Research. 2012. № 41. Р. 1213–1226. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.03.012

16. Torney-Purta J., Lehmann R., Oswald H., Schulz W. Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries: Civic knowledge and engagement at age fourteen. URL: https://www.iea.nl/sites/default/files/2019-04/ CIVED_Phase2_Age_Fourteen.pdf

17. Quintelier E. Engaging adolescents in politics: The longitudinal effect of political socialization agents. Youth & Society. 2015. № 47. Р. 51–69. DOI: 10.1177/0044118X13507295

18. Xenos M., Vromen A., Loader B.D. The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies // Information, Communication & Society. 2014. № 17. Р. 151–167. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318

19. Schlozman K.L., Verba S., Brady H.E. The unheavenly chorus: Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012. 693 р.

20. Barrett M., Brunton-Smith I. Political and civic engagement and participation: Towards an integrative perspective // Journal of Civil Society. 2014. № 10. Р. 5–28. DOI: 10.1080/17448689.2013.871911