Labor Subjectivity of Children in Sociology: Problems of Theoretical Conceptualization
https://doi.org/10.24412/1998-5533-2024-4-215-218
Abstract
The relevance of the topic stems from the need to search for new conceptualizations of children's subjectivity within the tradition of the new sociology of childhood. The purpose of the theoretical study is to designate a new labor approach to defining children's subjectivity. Within the framework of the designated goal, the following theoretical tasks were realized: the limitations of the existing approaches to children's subjectivity (philosophical, political, legal) were demonstrated; the history of the transformation of the relationship between children and labor was outlined; the social nature of the volume of children's participation in labor was demonstrated; the author's conceptualization of the relationship between labor and subjectivity of children was proposed; the prospects for empirical validation of the concept were outlined. The scientific and practical significance of the work can be deduced from the existing topical request of sociologists of the new sociology of childhood in the search for non-trivial ways of conceptualizing subjectivity, as well as in the conformity of the language of description with current social trends and phenomena (the spread of child employment, changes in legislation). Scientific novelty lies in the new author's view on the problem of children's subjectivity in the context of the existential theory of alienation of labor. resources.
About the Authors
V. P. AvdeevaRussian Federation
S. Tkach
Russian Federation
References
1. Ben-Arieh A., Casas F., Frones I., Korbin J.E. Multifaceted concept of child well-being // Handbook of child well-being. 2014. Vol. 1. Р. 1–27.
2. Байфорд Э. и др. В поисках детской субъектности // Антропологический форум. 2019. №. 42. С. 9–106.
3. Никитинаден Б.О. «Детство» в социальных науках: новые смыслы и новые подходы // Интеракция. Интервью. Интерпретация. 2009. №. 5. С. 7–24.
4. Козловская А.Ю., Козлова А.В. Детская агентность как предмет теоретической дискуссии и практическая проблема (антропологический комментарий) // Антропологический форум. 2020. № 45. С. 11–25.
5. Parker D.M. Sartre and No Child Left Behind: An existential psychoanalytic anthropology of urban schooling. Rowman & Littlefield, 2015; Thompson N. Child Development: An Existential Journey // Children, Adolescents, and Death. London: Routledge, 2017. Р. 121–131.
6. Дуглас M. Как мыслят институты / Пер. с англ. А.М. Корбута. М.: Элементарные формы, 2010. 167 c.
7. Zelizer V.A. Pricing the priceless child: the changing social value of children. Princeton: Princeton University Press: 1994. 576 p.
8. Дюркгейм Э. О разделении общественного труда. М.: Канон, 1996. 432 c.
9. Эльконин Д.Б. Детская психология: учеб. пособие для студ. высш. учеб. заведений / ред.-сост. Б.Д. Эльконин. М.: Издательский центр «Академия», 2007. 384 с.
10. James A. Constructing childhood: Theory, policy and social practice. Red Globe Press: 2004. 244 p.
11. Гребер Д. Бредовая работа: Трактат о распространении бессмысленного труда. М.: Ad Marginem, 2020. 497 с.
12. Brigden S. Youth and the English Reformation // Past & Present. 1982. № 95. P. 37–38.
13. Осин Е.Н., Леонтьев Д.А. Смыслоутрата и отчуждение //Культурно-историческая психология. 2007. Т. 3. №. 4. С. 68–77.
14. Wilson C. The Outsider. Boston: Houghton Mifflin,1956. 328 р.
15. Maddi S.R. Creating Meaning Through Making Decisions // The Human Search for Meaning / Ed. by P.T.P. Wong, P.S. Fry. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1998. Р. 3–26.
16. Маркс К.Г. Экономическо-философские рукописи 1844 г. М.: Litres, 2023. 224 с.
17. Сартр Ж.-П. Экзистенциализм – это гуманизм // Сумерки богов. 1989. С. 319–344.
18. Подростковая занятость. URL: https://labourforum.ru/translyacii/podrostkovayazanyatost-kak-najti-balans-mezhdu-interesamipodrostkov-rabotodatelej-i-gosudarstva/ (дата обращения: 5.11.2024).
19. Социологи СПбГУ на Форуме труда. URL: https://spbu.ru/news-events/novosti/sociologispbgu-na-forume-truda-cennost-truda-dolzhnazakladyvatsya-v-seme-s (дата обращения: 5.11.2024).
20. Пунгина А.П., Зайнаготдинова А.О., Сенникова М.А., Русакова М.М. «Чтобы не болтался»: внешкольная деятельность как мера профилактики девиантного поведения детей // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. 2022. Т. 25. № 1. С. 132–167.
Review
For citations:
Avdeeva V.P., Tkach S. Labor Subjectivity of Children in Sociology: Problems of Theoretical Conceptualization. The Review of Economy, the Law and Sociology. 2024;(4):215-218. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/1998-5533-2024-4-215-218
JATS XML






