Procedural Coercion in Jurisdictional Proceedings

This article is devoted to the study of the institution of procedural coercion in the jurisdictional process. The relevance of the study is caused by the law-restrictive nature of procedural coercion and the need, in view of this, to establish clear conditions and boundaries of its application, as well as the lack of a unified legislative approach to this category. The purpose of the work carried out is a comprehensive study of procedural coercion in certain types of jurisdictional processes, the establishment of general patterns in order to substantiate the general theoretical constructs of the phenomenon under consideration. The purpose of the work carried out is a comprehensive study of procedural coercion in certain types of jurisdictional processes, the establishment of general patterns in order to substantiate the general theoretical constructs of the phenomenon under consideration. The scientific and practical significance of the work was the formation of a holistic understanding of the patterns of formation of procedural coercion measures in Russian law, as well as the identification of the need to clearly consolidate a unified approach to the concept of “procedural coercion measure” in the current legislation. The authors also identified the subjects and objects of the application of procedural coercion measures, and classified them according to the degree of the role of their participation in the implementation of the goals and objectives of justice. In conclusion, the authors concluded that it is necessary to establish clear procedures for appealing procedural coercion measures as a guarantor of protection against dishonest behavior of participants in the process and access to justice.

1. Манджиева Е.В. Этапы становления и развития иных мер процессуального принуждения в России // Академическая мысль. – 2018. – № 4 – С. 117–119.

2. Кипрова Т.Н. Субъекты исполнения мер процессуального принуждения // Молодой ученый. – 2020. – № 48 (338). – С. 254–257.

3. Загидуллин М.Р. Процессуальная ответственность в цивилистическом процессе // Арбитражный и гражданский процесс. – 2020. – № 1. – С. 54–59.

4. Решетникова И.В. Унификация процессуального законодательства. Ждать ли революций?! // Законы России. – 2015. – № 3. – С. 3–9.

5. Люблинский П.И. Свобода личности в уголовном процессе. Меры, обеспечивающие неуклонение обвиняемого от правосудия. – СПб.: Се-натская типография, 1906. – 701 с.

6. Петрухин И.Л. Неприкосновенность личности и принуждение в уголовном процессе. – М.: Наука, 1989. – 252 с.