Teacher as a Social Agent of Digitalization of Higher Education
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the evolution of approaches to the study of the problem of digitalization's agent of higher education. The authors' methodological approach is based on the theory of social agent by A. Giddens, on the interpretation of the teachers' role as social agents capable of transforming the system of higher education and ensuring its successful digitalization.
The authors present the results of the sociological research devoted to the analysis of the level of digital maturity of higher education teachers.
About the Authors
L. A. BurganovaRussian Federation
O. V. Yurieva
Russian Federation
References
1. Martha A.S.D., Santoso H. The Design and Impact of the Pedagogical Agent: A Systematic Literature Review // The Journal of Educators Online. – 2019. – Vol. 16. – № 1. – DOI: 10.9743/jeo.2019.16.1.8.
2. Johnson W.L., Lester J.C. Pedagogical Agents: Back to the Future /Al Magazine, 2018. – Vol. 39. – № 2. – Р. 33–44. – DOI:10.1609/aimag.v39i2.2793.
3. Mikhalkina E.V., Chernova O.A., Gozalova A.V. Digitalization and the Principal-Agent Problem in the Higher Education // Digital Future Economic Growth, Social Adaptation, and Technological Perspectives. – URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340473711_Digitalization_and_the_Principal-Agent_Problem_in_the_Higher_Education
4. Kameneva I. The actual questions of the realization of the personality-oriented educational paradigm in the context of digitalization // E3S Web of Conferences. – 2021. – № 273. – 8 p. (12060). – URL: https://www.e3sconferences.org/articles/e3sconf/abs/2021/49/e3sconf_interagromash2021_12060/e3sconf_interagromash2021_12060.html (дата обращения: 24.02.2023).
5. Гидденс Э. Устроение общества: очерк теории структурации [пер. И. Тюрина]. – М.: Академический проект, 2003. – 525 с.
6. Marcelo C., Yot-Domínguez C. From chalk to keyboard in higher education classrooms: Changes and coherence when integrating technological knowledge into pedagogical content knowledge // Journal of Further and Higher Education. – 2018. – № 1. – P. 3-17. – URL: https://d.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1429584
7. Bond M., Marín V.L., Dolch C., Bedenlier S., Zawacki-Richter O. Digital transformation in German higher education: student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital m media // International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. – 2018. – Vol. 15. № 48. – P. 1–20. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1
8. Yureva O.V., Burganova L.A., Kukushkina O.Y., Myagkov G.P., Syradoev D.V. Digital Transformation and Its Risks in Higher Education: Students' and Teachers' Attitude // Universal Journal of Educational Research. – 2020. – № 8 (11B). – P. 5965–5971. – DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.082232
9. Бурганова Л.А., Юрьева О.В. Готовность вузовских преподавателей к работе в цифровой образовательной среде: компетентностный подход // Вестник экономики, права, социологии. – 2021. – № 2. – С. 67–72.
Review
For citations:
Burganova L.A., Yurieva O.V. Teacher as a Social Agent of Digitalization of Higher Education. The Review of Economy, the Law and Sociology. 2023;(4):258-263. (In Russ.)
JATS XML






